Can the Board consider new facts that arise after the original hearing?

The Board has the authority to consider new facts that arise after the original hearing. This flexibility allows the Board to make well-informed decisions based on the most current and relevant information. In many legal and regulatory contexts, especially in administrative proceedings, there can be developments or evidence that emerge post-hearing which may significantly impact the case. This capability ensures that the Board can take into account any changes in circumstances that could affect the outcome or relevance of its decisions.

The consideration of new facts aligns with the principle of ensuring justice and fairness in administrative procedures, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the situation rather than being strictly bound to the information available at the time of the initial hearing. It also permits parties involved to present additional relevant evidence that could influence the Board's decision-making process.