Is proof of actual damages required for an action under the injunction section?

In the context of actions under the injunction section, it is important to note that proof of actual damages is not required. This means that a party seeking an injunction does not need to demonstrate that they have sustained measurable monetary damages to obtain the court's intervention. The primary focus in such cases is often on the potential for harm or the necessity to prevent an ongoing or imminent injury, rather than on quantifiable losses that have already occurred.

Injunctions are typically issued to prevent irreparable harm, maintain the status quo, or protect rights that are being threatened. Therefore, the mere presence of a legitimate concern about potential harm can suffice for a court to grant an injunction, irrespective of whether actual damages can be demonstrated. This understanding aligns with the legal principle that equitable relief, such as an injunction, is often aimed at addressing situations where damages would be inadequate or where immediate action is necessary to prevent further harm.