What consequence can the Board impose on a licensee found guilty of fraudulently obtaining their license?

The consequence of revocation is appropriate in cases where a licensee is found guilty of fraudulently obtaining their license because it reflects the severity of the offense. Fraudulent actions undermine the integrity of the licensing process and violate public trust. By revoking the license, the Board sends a clear message that such conduct is unacceptable and that safeguarding public safety and ethical standards is a priority.

Revocation serves not only as a punishment for the individual involved but also as a deterrent to others who might consider engaging in similar deceptive practices. The action of revoking a license ensures that individuals who do not merit the trust afforded by a professional license will not be able to practice and potentially harm those they serve.

In cases involving fraudulent behavior, measures such as warnings or probation would generally be seen as insufficient responses to the gravity of the misconduct. Maintaining public safety and maintaining trust in professional licensing bodies necessitates more stringent corrective actions like license revocation.