Who is responsible for setting reasonable time limits on arguments and presentations of evidence during hearings?

The presiding officer is tasked with setting reasonable time limits on arguments and presentations of evidence during hearings. This role is crucial in ensuring that the hearing process is conducted efficiently and fairly. By establishing these time limits, the presiding officer helps to maintain order and focus, allowing all parties involved to present their cases without unnecessary delays or disruptions.

The presiding officer has the authority to manage the proceedings and to make decisions that promote a fair hearing environment. This includes balancing the need for thorough discussion with the practicalities of time constraints, ultimately aiming to facilitate a comprehensive yet efficient examination of the issues at hand.

Other entities mentioned, such as the Office of the Attorney General, the Board, and the respondent, have specific roles in the process, but they do not have the authority or responsibility to regulate the time allocated for presentations and arguments during the hearings. The Office of the Attorney General typically represents the state and provides legal support, the Board makes determinations based on the evidence and arguments presented, and the respondent participates in the hearings but does not set procedural rules.